Schur orthogonality relations

Matrix elements

Finite groups

For any finite group and irreps and of dimensions , Schur orthogonality relations consist of "row-orthogonality" [eq. ( Ham89, p.3.148 )] (orthogonality of matrix–entries across group elements):

(1)

and "column-orthogonality" [eq. ( Ham89, p.3.178 )] (completeness/orthogonality across irreps):

(2)

See also eqs. (2.19), (2.20) of [FH91]. The last equation is nothing more than

(3)

For finite groups we can always choose our representation to be unitary [Ham89, sec.3.11]. The consequence of it is

(4)

So othogonality relations become

(5)

and

(6)

Eq. (6) can be used to define Fourier tranform on (see Exercise 3.32 in [FH91])

(7)

where

(8)

Symmetric group

All irreps of symmetric group are not only unitary, but real, what implies

(9)

Schur orthogonality relations for are then

(10)
(11)

where

(12)

Irreps of are indexed by , so and we have

(13)
(14)

Compact groups

Unitary group

Schur orthogonality relations for are

(15)
(16)

where . The general form of this these relations for arbitrary compact groups doesn't differ much and is due to Peter and Weyl. Schur proved such a formula for finite groups and now everything of that type is called by his name. See eqs. (3.1) and (3.17) of [IZ80], as well as eqs. (2), (3) on p. 44 and eqs. (4), (5) on p. 46 of [Vil68].

Haar measure above is of course assumed to be properly normalized

(17)

Fourier transform on reads as

(18)

where

(19)

Characters

Finite groups

"Raw-orthogonality" for characters

(20)

is easily derived from (5) by summing over and and using the definition of character:

(21)
(22)

"Column-orthogonality" for the characters

(23)

where denotes the order of the centralizer of , is a bit more involved in proof.

Symmetric group

For the symmetric group with the irreducible characters coincide on the elements of the same conjugacy class (cycle-type) and thus are denoted by . Size of the centralizer of any permutation of cycle type is denoted as . The order of conjugacy class is then . All these allows us to write "column-orthogonality" relations for the symmetric group

(24)

from (23), as well as "row-orthogonality" ones

(25)

The latter follows from (20) by the following observation

(26)

Compact groups

Unitary group

"Raw-orthogonality" again can be easily derived from the corresponding relation for matrix elements and reads as

(27)

provided we interpret as the character of the irreducible polynomial –representation of highest weight (i.e. a partition with ). As are class functions (constant on conjugacy classes of — symmetric functions of eigenvalues), Weyl integration formula helps us to rewrite this expression in the form

(28)

where is the Vandermonde determinant. This observation can help one motivate the standard inner product on the maximal torus on the space of symmetric functions

(29)

"Column-orthogonality" relation is

(30)

with as before. Again, the derivation of this statement seems to be a bit more involved.

References

[Ham89]
M. Hamermesh, Group theory and its application to physical problems. Dover Publications, 1989.
[FH91]
W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation theory: A first course. Springer, 1991.
[IZ80]
C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, “The planar approximation. ii,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–421, 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.524438.
[Vil68]
N. J. Vilenkin, Special functions and the theory of group representations, Revised. American Mathematical Society, 1968.